The best other to take is to follow your heart on an impractical path with limited opportunity. This path is the best because doing a job you love may reward you in the end. In addition, you will feel better about your life knowing that you followed your heart and pursued the career you wanted. It may be tough to make a career with employment, but it can be even more challenging when you make a career that you hate. Furthermore, the benefit of the path that I have is that you get to enjoy it, leading to more job satisfaction. Moreover l, the benefits of using your marketable skills and talents even though you hate the job is that you can make a lot of money and be satisfied financially. Additionally, the dangers of following your heart in your career are that it will be hard to take breaks when it is necessary, and other aspects of your life can suffer. The dangers of doing a job you hate are that it can cause adverse effects on your health, and you may not be satisfied with your life. Each path has its pros and cons, but it is up to the individual whether the risks are worth it.
I hope this helps you.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The answer is C because she or he is giving reasons like its not reasonable to prepare at the last minute on an exam then you would fail. It also says that if you don't prepare for a marathon you''ll probably get last place like a low grade on a exam.
Answer: The answer is you can neither be fully supportive of the either. In fact the battle will go on or you may the arguments will perhaps get louder in the years to come.
Explanation: None of the nations wants to back from using a lucrative resources that they chance upon fully knowing the repercussions of climate change and various other damaging havoc that can impact the entire earth.
The greed in humans cannot be killed and perhaps we already are paying a heavy price for it. The conservationists believe the usage of the resources should be done in a responsible manner.
The supply need not be jeopardised for the future generations but no objections in continuing to use them though. Sustainability is the argument that they propound.
The preservationists are purists in the true sense they don't want to disturb mother nature and allow them to flourish in their pristine form and we continue to live in harmony with that.
The intrinsic value of the land and other resources have to retained and gained inspiration for its beauty and serenity. It is the theory that preservationists have stuck too for years.
Each is right in their own way, if we don't use the natural resources we won't be able to function as well as we do.
If we don't preserve some of the natural resources and stick our head into every resource on the surface of the earth, there will be large destruction and extinction of flora and fauna.
Hence it would be right to say, that we need to rethink what we are going to do because in the next few years what we do will determine our future and there is no going back then.
