I am sorry. I have found the infomation about Thomas Hobbes and William. You would need to write the comparative analysis on your own. In case, you do not feel like doing it, check Prime Writings site to be sure.
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and John Locke (1632-1704) were both great thinkers of their time and noted for their influences on political thinking. Each philosopher has a unique viewpoint on the nature of man, man’s relationship with society, and man’s relationship with government. The elements of their viewpoints will be compared and contrasted for similarities and differences.
Williams (2003) conveyed the philosophical fundamentals of Thomas Hobbes’ works. Hobbes, Williams stated, felt that people are basically egotistical in that any man is capable of killing one another under the right circumstances, and no one is exempt from this rule. People are egotistical because when push comes to shove, people will do anything they can to secure their physical safety and ensure their own survival. Not all people are bad, or selfish, Hobbes conveyed, but when it comes to their own personal survival, all morals are circumvented and people will do what it takes to ensure their own survival. In this circumstances, when fighting for limited resources to survive, any person has the capability to kill one another, and no one is exempted from this rule.
<u>Because the Russians practiced scorch and burn policy by destroying all of their crops and livestock so that the French army had nothing to eat. This made the French troops extremely weak and ill which gave the Russians the upper hand.</u>
<u>hope</u><u> </u><u>it</u><u> </u><u>helps</u><u>.</u>
<u>have</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>great</u><u> </u><u>day</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u>
The correct answer is the last option relates to the right of an owner to retain his or her property