1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergeu [11.5K]
3 years ago
12

Pakistan began as a divided nation. its east and west regions were A. The brahmaputra river B. 1,000 miles of Indian territory C

. 500 miles of Afghan territory D. the krishna river
History
1 answer:
Nesterboy [21]3 years ago
8 0
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "B. 1,000 miles of Indian territory." Pakistan began as a divided nation. its east and west regions were <span>1,000 miles of Indian territory. This is the correct answer.</span>
You might be interested in
What was the idea behind popular sovereignty in the mid-1800s? 
spayn [35]
<span>C. Allowing newly added territories to the United States decide for themselves the slavery issue.

</span>

Popular sovereignty was proposed as a way to decide the issue of slavery in the new territories. Under such a system, the local population would decide the slavery issue rather than Congress.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which group called for the immediate end to slavery without compensation?
pogonyaev

Early Abolitionist

Explanation:

this are the pupils or group which are called for the immediate end to slavery without any compensation

3 0
3 years ago
What were andrew johnson policies concerning the rights of African Americans?
Lelu [443]

for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.

Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.

Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.

Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.

7 0
3 years ago
ASAP HELP BRAINLIEST for anyone who awnsers correctly.
Illusion [34]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The Mayflower compact expressed deep loyalty to Britain

6 0
3 years ago
How did the delhi sultanate affect Indian government and society
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

How did the Delhi Sultanate affect Indian government and society? ... At first, the sultanate cracked down on non-Muslim populations, slaughtering Hindus and Buddhists and destroying their places of worship. Eventually, the sultans became more tolerant, allowing Hindus to worship as long as they paid a tax.

Explanation:

because i know it

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What role did Venezuela Play in WW2?
    6·1 answer
  • What treaty ended world war 1 but was rejected by the senate?
    15·2 answers
  • Did you know that your foot is the same size as your wrist to your elbow
    8·2 answers
  • A “resident alien” of the United States, refers to someone who
    14·2 answers
  • The population of Native Americans in Mexico and Central America were wiped out by the Spanish in the 1500's.
    5·1 answer
  • After Britain passed the Tea Act, which Founding Father organized the Boston Tea Party?
    14·1 answer
  • Osaka is southeast of what city?<br><br><br> Select one:<br> a. Kyoto<br> b. Hiroshima<br> c. Kobe
    5·2 answers
  • When a Senate subcommittee released its final report in 1919 entitled "Bolshevik Propaganda" newspapers across the country sensa
    15·1 answer
  • In the 1970s Gerald Ford was
    14·1 answer
  • How did the development of atomic weaponry affect American society? In what ways did it change the daily lives of Americans?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!