Here is how the graph would look!
Hope this helps :)
This conclusion is not valid because BOTH SOIL BRANDS WERE NOT SUBJECTED TO THE SAME CONDITIONS.
Carlisle applied brand A to the part of the yard that received full sunlight while brand B was applied to the area of the yard which received partial sunlight. This implies that the soils were subjected to different conditions and this ought not to be so, since sunlight is a very important factor, which the soils need.
Answer:
109
Step-by-step explanation:
You can brute-force this:
Candidate numbers that are divisable by 13 if you take away 5: 18
, 31
, 44
, 57
, 70
, 83
, 96
, <u>109
</u>, 122
, 135
, 148
Candidate numbers that are divisable by 14 if you take away 11: 25
, 39
, 53
, 67
, 81
, 95
, <u>109
</u>, 123
, 137
Only 109 is in both lists.
It would be replaced with f(-2) which is the reciperacle of 2x
