1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Veronika [31]
3 years ago
12

Find the area of the figure.

Mathematics
1 answer:
marta [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

37.5

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Isandro and Yvette each have a calculator. Yvette starts at 100 and subtracts 7 each time. Isandro on the other hand, starts at
LenaWriter [7]
Yvette = 100-7x
Isandro = 0+3x

0+3x = 100 - 7x
0+3x+7x = 100 - 7x +7x
10x = 100
x = 10
So on the 10th time they have the same number, which is 30.
8 0
3 years ago
Help me out please.i will give brainly
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

Hello! answer: 17

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming this is the Pythagorean theorem our formula would be

a^2 + b^2 = c^2

meaning both of those sides multiplied by themselves added together will equal a number which is the result of c multiplied byitself sorry it sounds confused but...

15 × 15 = 225 8 × 8 = 64 225 + 64 = 289

the square root or the (number multiplied byitself that equals 289) is 17 because

17 × 17 = 289 so × = 17 I hope that helps!

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Help me with this please
o-na [289]

Answer:

C is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

3+6=9

2 sides on a triangle must be greater than the other side

6 0
3 years ago
Line r is parallel to line t. Find m<6
oee [108]
Is there a picture to this?
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • An apartment that rented for $750 per month in 2005 was rented for $825 in 2006. What was the percent increase in rent?
    9·1 answer
  • Write two decimals, each less than 1, which multiply to make 0.1
    8·1 answer
  • Cory made 4500 g of candy. He saved 1 kg to eat later. He divided the rest of the candy over 7 bowls to serve at his party.
    8·2 answers
  • What is the value of k(-3) when k(t) = -|4t|
    11·1 answer
  • A group of 5 friends decide to set up a lemonade stand . They sell 48 cups of lemonade for $1.35 each.
    14·2 answers
  • 15. Determine the y-intercept for the following equation<br> 4x + 2y = -12
    6·2 answers
  • Someone pls help!!!???
    8·1 answer
  • Simplify your answer as much as possible<br> 4(u+8)-8u=12
    15·1 answer
  • What is 0.0000007 in standard form
    10·2 answers
  • Please help asap tysm &lt;3
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!