Why are parking tickets unfair write 250 words about it i need help pls and thx

1 answer:

8 0

Answer:In some cities, parking signs are confusing, and parking isn’t always easy to find. If you drive enough, chances are that you’ll end up with a parking ticket at some point.

If you clearly did something wrong, like parking in a no-parking or street-cleaning zone, you should just pay the ticket and be done with it. If you didn’t, you should quickly file an appeal so that the issue can get sorted out as soon as possible.

How do tickets impact your driving record? And what happens if you don't pay your ticket? Learn the answers to these questions and more.

This driving history will impact your insurance rate. If you’re a risky driver with lots of violations, you’ll have higher rates. If you put off paying too many parking tickets, the DMV could take drastic action: towing your vehicle, putting a boot on it, or suspending your vehicle registration.2

Dealing with a Parking Ticket

The easiest way to deal with a parking ticket that you received for a legitimate error on your part is to pay it immediately.

If you believe you should not have gotten a ticket, you should protest the ticket as soon as possible and secure a date for a traffic court appearance. There, a judge will hear from you and the officer who issued the citation. Then, they will decide whether you received the parking ticket in error.

If you don’t pay or resolve the ticket by a certain date, the amount you owe may increase. Parking tickets do not go on a driving record—they go to the financial record of the registered owner of a vehicle if they are not paid on time. They could also be reported to the DMV, which could result in serious consequences.3

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Which literary device is used in this excerpt from Book 24 of Homer's Odyssey to describe Ulysses’s happiness?

liq [111]

Answer:

B.) epic simile

7 0

3 years ago

Write a five-hundred word report, detailing the specific problems that developed as a result of the weaknesses of the Articles o

Alex Ar [27]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation comprised the United States’ first constitution, lasting from 1776 until 1789. The Articles established a weak central government and placed most powers in the hands of the states. Under the Articles, the US economy faltered, since the central government lacked the power to enforce tax laws or regulate commerce. Shays’s Rebellion, an uprising of Revolutionary War veterans in Massachusetts that both the state and national governments struggled to address due to a lack of centralized military power, illustrated the need to create a stronger governing system. The United States’ transition from a ragtag group of colonies to a successful independent nation was a little like the transition period from childhood to adulthood. As the colonies matured, American colonists grew to despise being treated as the children of Great Britain. Like rebellious teens, they vowed that when they won their independence, their government would be nothing like that of the mother country. It’s no surprise that when the leaders of the former colonies finally did get the chance to set up their own government as the new United States, they were mostly focused on trying to avoid what they had perceived as abuses wrought by an overly-powerful government. Their first constitution was called the Articles of Confederation. It bound the states together in a loose “league of friendship” that permitted the states to retain nearly all government power. The Articles of Confederation held the new United States together long enough for it to prevail in the Revolutionary War, but once the war was over the league of friends quickly became a league of impoverished quibblers. The Founders had been so concerned with making sure the central government couldn’t become too powerful that they neglected to make it powerful enough to solve the issues facing a new nation. The American states evolved from separate colonies, with unique histories and societies. In the years before and during the Revolution, they learned to find common cause with each other, but they hardly saw themselves as a unified nation. The Articles of Confederation exemplified this mindset. The document created a confederacy, in which states considered themselves independent entities linked together for limited purposes, such as national defense. State governments had the sovereignty to rule within their own territories. The national government had few powers. It could coin money, direct the post office, and negotiate with foreign powers, including Native American tribes. To raise money or soldiers, it could only request that the states provide what was needed. The national government had only one branch, the Confederation Congress, in which each state had one vote. Populous Virginia had no more political power than tiny Delaware. The requirements for passing measures were quite high: nine of the thirteen states had to approve a measure for it to pass. Amending the Articles themselves was even harder: all thirteen had to vote in favor of a change. One of the biggest problems was that the national government had no power to impose taxes. To avoid any perception of “taxation without representation,” the Articles of Confederation allowed only state governments to levy taxes. To pay for its expenses, the national government had to request money from the states. The states, however, were often negligent in this duty, and so the national government was underfunded. Without money, the US government could not pay debts owed from the Revolution or easily secure new funds. Foreign governments were reluctant to loan money to a nation that might never repay it. The fiscal problems of the central government meant that the currency it issued, called the Continental, was largely worthless. The country’s economic woes were made worse by the fact that the central government also lacked the power to impose tariffs on foreign imports or regulate interstate commerce. Thus, it couldn’t protect American producers from foreign competitors. Compounding the problem, states often imposed tariffs on items produced by other states and otherwise interfered with their neighbors’ trade. The national government under the Articles also lacked the power to raise an army or navy. Fears of a standing army in the employ of a tyrannical government had led the writers of the Articles of Confederation to leave defense largely to the states. Although the central government could declare war and agree to peace, it had to depend upon the states to provide soldiers. If state governors chose not to honor the national government’s request, the country would lack an adequate defense. The weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation became apparent to all as a result of an uprising of Massachusetts farmers known as Shays’s Rebellion. In the summer of 1786, farmers in western Massachusetts were heavily in debt, facing imprisonment and the loss of their lands.

5 0

3 years ago

Read the sentence. Much of Emily Dickinson’s poetry has the same rhythm as the song, “The Yellow Rose of Texas.” Where would you

Inessa05 [86]

This kind of information could be found on a survey where a comparison between the poem and the song can be found-.
In the case of the notecard can be used as a speech reminder and the source card might be used for indexing as well as referencing main pages.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the subject of the sentence below? We students enjoy stories about missionaries.

jeka94

Answer: students

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Explain which cultures values more closely match your own why

Aneli [31]

Answer:

Yes, it is very much true that almost every culture has its own values, ethical paradigms, religion, practices, rituals, norms, educational systems, language and behavioral patterns, but somehow or other they are similar in the basic patterns but with varying intensity. Every culture will have a particular religion which they follow, every culture have a language and rituals, but different cultures have different set of these dimensions and domains. In every culture, men and women live together in some kind of form and arrangements, where some give it legal and religion status as well, whereas, as in some culture living together is more important than any other rule or regulation but pattern of living life is the same. Why this is so, because we are all human beings and we have almost the same needs, state of felt deprivation, we all want to eat something, but we differ when it comes to wants. In some culture, if you are hungry, you can eat pizza, while in some other culture you eat Chicken tikka masala. Difference comes in terms of shape of the rules, but rules are same, you eat, wither it could be pizza or chicken tikka masala.

5 0

3 years ago