1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jolli1 [7]
2 years ago
11

What supreme court decision was overturned in Brown v. Board of education of topeka?

History
1 answer:
algol [13]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

c. Plessy v. Ferguson

Explanation:

Board of Education of Topeka on May 17, 1954 is perhaps the most famous of all Supreme Court cases, as it started the process ending segregation. It overturned the equally far-reaching decision of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896.

You might be interested in
Why would peisistratus have been popular with poor people?
kherson [118]

Answer:

I don't know and I am ten years old

3 0
2 years ago
What can you say about Bhuddha’s teachings?
Veronika [31]

Answer:

The teachings of the Buddha are aimed solely at liberating sentient beings from suffering. The Basic Teachings of Buddha which are core to Buddhism are: The Three Universal Truths; The Four Noble Truths; and • The Noble Eightfold Path.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What judeo-christian and greco-roman values and beliefs support a democratic system?
jenyasd209 [6]

One of the main qualities for Greeks was justice, but then again this had a much wider meaning than it does in English. It meant also treating people justly and justifiably. In Greco-Roman law the defendant had the right to guard himself, although deprived of money he was left defending himself. The Greek city states could be oligarchies or a division of the army, or a restricted democracy. Rome started as a kingdom and then turn into a republic – in the first place, aristocratic only but then merchants got voted, and after much widespread anxiety the people were embodied by the Tribune. Furthermore, any Roman citizen could vote, a major concern at that period.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the role of Otto von Bismarck played in he unification of Germany
beks73 [17]

The man who did most to unite the German states was Otto Von Bismarck. He was the Prussian Chancellor and his main goal was to strengthen even further the position of Prussia in Europe. His primary aims were to:

unify the north German states under Prussian control

weaken Prussia's main rival, Austria, by removing it from the Bund

make Berlin the centre of German affairs - not Vienna

strengthen the position of the King of Prussia, William I, to counter the demands for reform from the Liberals in the Prussian parliament (the Reichstag).

It is important to note that there is much debate about Bismarck's aims to unify all German states under Prussian rule. Some historians argue that Bismarck only intended to unify the north German states but the strength of nationalist feelings after 1866 led to German unification under its own steam. According to this opinion, Bismarck actually reacted to political changes in other German states and capitalised on it rather than pursuing a master plan from the beginning to control all German states.


Army reforms

Bismarck wanted to build up Prussia's army in case his unification plans led to war. To do this he needed money. The Prussian parliament refused to allow money to be raised for Bismarck's military reforms.


Bismarck ignored the Reichstag and simply collected the money for army reforms through general taxation. He never bothered to obtain permission from the Reichstag.


Congress of Princes 1863

To counter Prussia's growing influence, Austria tried to strengthen its position in the Bund. Since it was in theory the leading member of the Bund, an increase in the power of the Bund would strengthen Austria.


Bismarck thwarted Austria's plans by insisting on popular elections to the Diet (the Bund's parliament). Austria refused and neither its or Bismarck's reforms happened.

Bismarck had successfully ruined Austria's plans and was seen, ironically, as a defender of the Liberal nationalists.


5 0
3 years ago
8. How does the legislative branch check the power of the judicial branch?
Elodia [21]

Answer:

Other checks and balances include:. Executive over the judicial branch. The president appoints all federal judges. legislative branch must approve appointments that the president makes; the Senate must approve treatjes that the president makes; and the legislative branch may investigate the executive branch.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The industrial revolution has been described as a mixed blessing. do you agree or disagree?
    10·1 answer
  • "who was moses' successor? what was to be his task?
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes a government in which there is no separate of powers
    11·2 answers
  • How did Native Americans respond to the United States’ entry into World War I? Most Native Americans became active in the antiwa
    9·1 answer
  • choose the best way to complete this paragraph about the economic factors behind the transatlantic slave trade​
    9·1 answer
  • Which emerged in opposition to the Missouri Compromise?
    12·1 answer
  • Spain was worried about losing domination over Texas to France so they implemented the mission system for colonizing Texas.
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is FALSE?
    11·2 answers
  • What is the significance of King Narmer?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!