Answer:
The term which best describes "when a group or person has power or legal authority over a topic or area" is:
3. Jurisdiction.
Explanation:
Jurisdiction refers to the lawful authority given to a person or institution to govern or legislate, exercise authority, or control decisions or judgments. Such authorities are usually exercisable within a specific geographic area, topic, and/or over certain types of legal cases. This means that the given authority is not universally blanket. Instead, it is limited to a particular area, topic, or issue.
Answer: This demonstrate the principle of "GENOCIDE"
Explanation: Genocide is the killing or maltreatment of a group of people in a country or the same ethnic group.
Genocide is when the leadership of a country of a group suppress his people to become his subject, by killing them and maltreating them to death.
If the leadership of a sovereign states say he wants the mess with his people, that means he wants to maltreat or kill his people on his own will. This is referred to genocide, because he has no legal right as a leader to kill the people he leads. The citizens of a country are the people subject to the soveregn laws of the leadership of that country.
For a leader to ask for such authority, that means the leader has an intentions of killing or maltreating his people. Genocide is always against human right, and the world will stand against any nation that deprives his people from their human rights.
Answer: because women are considered "lower" in the older days
Explanation: because females had a lot of bias towards them and they were treated unfairly
Answer:
It can reduce brain injuries.
Explanation:
This rule of wearing helmet is a good initiative taken by the commissioner of the national football league. these helmets reduce the risk of concussions because these helmets are made of good materials and able to protect the head of the players from brain injury. So avoid such type of injuries, the helmet should be used by the player which can absorb all the energy and protect the head of the player.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
