Gretta is most likely to name her daughter as the person that she would like to care for her if she became ill or disabled. However, it is vital to note that most people in the country that have lost their spouse prefer to live alone,
⭐️The answer is⭐️
The French government officials and tribal sovereignty had an exchange program between Native children and French children that helped build diplomacy among the two groups, known as "metis".
johanna was avoided by professor stuckup anytime she wore jeans, but professor casual wasn't bothered. johanna learned not to wear jeans around professor stuckup which is result of discrimination training.
Give a brief account on discrimination training.
Discrimination training entails rewarding a behavior (like as pecking) when one stimulus is present but not the others. One of the Bailey's chickens was given two note cards in the image on the left, one of which had a red circle and the other a blue circle. The peck on the red circle strengthened, but the peck on the blue circle did not (this process involves differential reinforcement). The fowl finally restricted its pecking to the red circle. The Baileys also demonstrated discrimination training with geometric figures using note cards with various shapes (such as circles vs. squares).
As long as the animal possesses the necessary sensory equipment, such as color vision, discrimination training is supposed to enable animals like chickens to "tell the difference" between forms (like rectangles or squares) or colors (like green or blue).
To know more about, discrimination training, visit :
brainly.com/question/28122069
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
Explanation:
The idea in this question is to identify the most vulnerable argument, for which it is possible to conclude that The first argument is only base in the opinion of the theorists and critics and there is no clear evidence or facts to prove the statement. It only states because of someone's opinion “no aesthetic evaluation of a work of art is sound if it is based even in part on data about the cultural background of the artist” simply the argument is false. This results as a fallacy since it is an argument without evidence to show that it is valid.
Explanation:
it control my values my acts my point of view my thought . it influence me in every thing
