I really don’t know but try it and see
Answer:
Ok so it's been a minute since I've done this however the answer would be A I think.
- 3x+2y=3
- subtract 3x and put it behind 2y
- divide by 2 throughout the entire equation
- subtract 1 3/2 on both sides of the equation
- you should get y=0
The possible values for the ones digit are 0, 2, 4, 6, or 8.
Answer:
The sample size is too small
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is the last one: the sample size is too small. Since we only got 3 subjects to test, maybe one of them could live for a long time after the diagnosis of Cacer and that made the average survival time go up by a lot.
In order to obtain results with a significance level higher, you need a sample size of at least 20 subjects.
Now lets see why other options wouldnt be good answers:
- For a small amount of subjects, it is unlikely to have errors in caculation
- The sample size is given
- We are not given information about the treatment and we dont even know if the subjects feel more confident with the new treatment. Also, if a Placebo effect works regularly, it shouldnt limit statistical sifgnificance
- An increase in 2 years is huge in comparison with the previous survival time.
