Answer: Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.
Explanation:
In the aforementioned article, the author explains how using starvation and food insecurity as weapons of war by destroying food resources, can be more damaging than the use of weapons.
Destroying food resources can threaten entire populations as they may starve to death while weapons cannot regularly do so. For instance, Germany could have implemented food destruction policies in WWII that would have killed 20 million Russians and the starvation of Biafra by the Nigerian government during the Biafran war killed many times more Biafrans by the armed conflict did.
Answer: He argued that observation and experimentation are the most important tools for understanding the natural world. ... It caused people to take a new, logical approach to scientific discovery based on experimentation and observation.
