Answer:
I think it is C)Kenyatta spent 9 years in prison during Kenya’s independence movement
The traits, which are not linked to high levels of political engagement, include Whites vote more frequently than Blacks and Latinos do if race and ethnicity are the only factors taken into account. As a result, choice is right.
Public engagement in politics is referred to as political participation. Voting is one way that people may participate in politics. There are other methods as well.Men are typically seen to be more involved in politics than women. The more qualified candidates receive votes from the educated population, who believe it is their civic duty to do so.Whites vote more frequently than Blacks and Latinos, on the basis of race and ethnicity.
learn more about political engagement here:
brainly.com/question/27819452
#SPJ4
Answer: Older adulthood
Explanation:
Older adulthood is the phase of life where an individual tries to find the meaning of life , moves towards the work that provides satisfaction to them and peace in life.They move away from illusional environment and negative factors.This stage occurs near about age of 65.
According to the question, Kevin is in his older adulthood stage of life span where he is looking for peace and satisfaction through mediation and spend his rest of time to find life's meaning.
B. i’m pretty sure don’t take my word for it
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
