Let me handle your first question -- always good to do one question at a time here. :-)
Prior to President Theodore Roosevelt, those who preceded him in federal government had tended to side with industry leaders, expecting laborers to fall in line and do the work for the good of the companies. In 1902, when there was a particularly tense strike by coal workers, Roosevelt invited both sides (labor leaders and management leaders) to the White House to negotiate. This was an example of the way he saw the role of government leadership as "steward" to the nation, mediating on behalf of everyone's interests, not just the interests of a powerful small group. His "Square Deal" policies were aimed at making things fair and square for the general public. An example of this would be how much land was set aside under his administration as national forests, national parks, national monuments, etc. He was seeking to protect the use of the land for all Americans' interests, rather than letting corporations tear into any land or forest they wanted in order to grab natural resources.
Explanation:
Anti-Federalism was a late-18th century movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and which later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The previous constitution, called the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, gave state governments more authority. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, Anti-Federalists worried, among other things, that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. Though the Constitution was ratified and supplanted the Articles of Confederation, Anti-Federalist influence helped lead to the passage of the United States Bill of Rights.
Answer:
I think the answer is (C) option
William Jennings Bryan is a prominent American politician who supports anti-imperialism. He calls for a rejection of imperialism in American policy on the grounds that imperialism is directly opposed to basic American values. Specifically, he mentions that God gives every human heart the love of Liberty and any human kind regardless any level of civilization or intelligence would never want to be controlled by a foreign country. In order to point out the conflict between the ideas behind the establishment of the United States and imperial ambitions, he recalls what Lincoln said that the safety of America was built in the spirit that treasure liberty as a “heritage <span>of all men, in all lands, everywhere” and United States should never go against this spirit.</span>
