1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anettt [7]
3 years ago
5

What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution?

History
2 answers:
Svet_ta [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

"A separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the new government would have limited power" is the best option, since they thought that this would be redundant in a Constitution already given to these ideals.  

Explanation:

LenaWriter [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A separate bill of rights might be used later to limit rights that were not originally listed.

Explanation:

they like having a bunch rights lol

You might be interested in
Why do factions form coalitions?
andrezito [222]

Answer:

People with the same interests need to form a cooperative group in order to get enough votes to win.

Explanation:

I got it right on the assignment, hope this helps!

4 0
2 years ago
Help I give brainliest for the best answer or the quickest answer
Sonja [21]

Answer:

i would choose b but i don't know what you talking about

7 0
3 years ago
Congress members elected based on population 3/5 Compromise
MAVERICK [17]

Answer:

how slaves were counted checks and balances

Explanation:

Congress members elected based on population 3/5 Compromise  were voted based on how slaves were counted. In this method, a slave was counted as three-fifth of a free individual and it was employed in taxation and representation in the United States House of Representative. The three-fifth compromise was reached in 1787 and was abolished in 1865 by the Thirteenth Amendment.

8 0
2 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST FOR FASTEST HELPFUL ANSWER!!!
liberstina [14]
The root cause of the American Civil War is perhaps the most controversial topic in American history. Even before the war was over, scholars in the North and South began to analyze and interpret the reasons behind the bloodshed.


The scholars immediately disagreed over the causes of the war and disagreement persists today. Many maintain that the primary cause of the war was the Southern states’ desire to preserve the institution of slavery. Others minimize slavery and point to other factors, such as taxation or the principle of States' Rights.

In 2011, at the outset of the sesquicentennial, a Pew Research Center poll found that Americans were significantly divided on the issue, with 48% saying the war was "mainly about states' rights," 38% saying the war was "mainly about slavery," with the remainder answering "both equally" or "neither/don't know."
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the colonies what was the difference between farm life and city life
zvonat [6]
Farm life as more behind in technology while cities were more fast-paced, had more jobs and used more technology.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The context for Black Codes is:
    13·1 answer
  • War with which nation greatly contributed to the economic downfall of the Soviet Union?
    11·2 answers
  • What was the primary goal of american foreign policy in the nineteenth century?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a requirement for a treaty?
    13·1 answer
  • Someone help me please
    8·2 answers
  • What is the role of these bacteria in the nitrogen<br> cycle?
    7·2 answers
  • The moving away from traditional church rituals began during which of the following events
    15·1 answer
  • What was the impact on the Vietnam war on the armed forces.
    5·1 answer
  • Was the US justified in dropping the atomic bombs on japan ?why or why not ? it's for a friend of mine.​
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE I NEED HELP ASAP​
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!