Answer:
Fraction of the original board left = 
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the length of the board is = l feet
Marty saws off 
of a wooden board.
Length of the board left = l - 
= 
feet
He saws off 
of the remaining board,
Board left = ![(\frac{4}{5})l-[(\frac{4}{5})l\times (\frac{3}{4})]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B5%7D%29l-%5B%28%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B5%7D%29l%5Ctimes%20%28%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B4%7D%29%5D)
= 
= 
feet
He finally saws off 
rd of the remaining board.
Board left = ![\frac{1}{5}l-[\frac{1}{5}\times \frac{1}{3}]l](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B5%7Dl-%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B5%7D%5Ctimes%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%5Dl)
= 
= 
feet
Fraction of the original board left = 
=
C
First you -4 from x so you have to do the opposite which is to add 4
Answer:
700
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: 14.2 - 5a
Work: I just did "CLT" of "Combine Like Terms". I did 8 + 6.2 First because 8 is first, then I did 4a - 9a which is -5a, and I combined them, and got the answer. I hope this helps, and stay safe! :)
This is an inappropriate conclusion because of <u>D. At 10 months</u>, ninety percent of toddlers have not reached the developmental milestones to walk.
<h3>What is an inappropriate conclusion?</h3>
An inappropriate conclusion is one arrived at without a proper research design. An inappropriate conclusion can also be reached when the interpretation of the research result is not based on the findings.
Our conclusion implies that there is a wrong interpretation of the research findings because of the researcher's bias.
Thus, the research conclusion is <u>inappropriate</u> because of Option D.
Learn more about research conclusions at brainly.com/question/24542637
