Answer:
does not injure competition.
Explanation:
Online Media Inc. bundles its products so that consumers are forced to pay for access to some sites that they do not want in order to obtain access to sites that they do want. A court will likely rule that the bundling does not violate the rule of reason if it <u>does not injure competition</u>.
Explanation:
In international development, good governance is a way of measuring how public institutions conduct public affairs and manage public resources in a preferred way. Governance is "the process of decision-making and the process by which decisions are implemented (or not implemented)".[1] Governance in this context can apply to corporate, international, national, or local governance[1] as well as the interactions between other sectors of society.
The concept of "good governance" thus emerges as a model to compare ineffective economies or political bodies with viable economies and political bodies.[2] The concept centers on the responsibility of governments and governing bodies to meet the needs of the masses as opposed to select groups in society. Because countries often described as "most successful" are liberal democratic states, concentrated in Europe and the Americas, good governance standards often measure other state institutions against these states.[2] Aid organizations and the authorities of developed countries often will focus the meaning of "good governance" to a set of requirements that conform to the organization's agenda, making "good governance" imply many different things in many different contexts.[3][4][5] The opposite of good governance, as a concept, is bad governance.[6]
Answer:
"Misdemeanor" would be the right approach.
Explanation:
- A misdemeanor would be a reasonable punishment and probably involves nothing more than a term of imprisonment, one year with the prison, community outreach, as well as suspended sentence.
- They can quickly develop into felony convictions. Besides obvious reasons, trying to intimidate someone to attack someone would have been considered fraud, but currently implementing an offensive would have been a federal offense.
Answer: B. Ural Mountains
Explanation: Mark me brainliest plzzz
Answer: Hindus / Hinduism :)
Explanation: