Gerund phrases are used as nouns
Answer:
They deal with the snake conflict in a very calm and controlled manner.
Explanation:
"The dinner party" written by Mona Gardner is a short story about a dinner with men and women, where men claim that women do not have the same emotional control as men and that at the slightest sign of danger they start screaming. Although the women present disagree, the men continue to defend this argument. At this moment, the American sees that the hostess of the party, which is a woman, speaks very quietly and quietly to a boy. The woman says that there is a snake in the room. When the American sees the snake he is also calm, but he does an experiment to see if people really have the emotional control they claim they have. Upon revealing that there is a snake in the room, some people startle scream. At this point the American states that the first person to see the snake was the hostess and asks her how she perceived the animal's presence. The hostess says the snake was lying on her foot.
As we can see, the woman did not shout at the snake so close to her, which shows that she, like the American, dealt with the conflict very calmly.
The adjective forms that compares only two people, places, or things is Comparative form.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
There are three forms of Adjectives: Positive, Comparative, and Superlative. If we have to make a comparison between any two objects, places, or people, then we make use of Comparative form.
For example: ‘Rahul is taller than Saurabh.’ In this sentence a comparison is made between Rahul and Saurabh. One rule that applies in this type of form is that such forms consists of words that ends with ‘-er’ and ‘-est.’ We can see in the example taller is a word that ends with -er.
Answer:
among many who have been killed because Stand Your Ground law.
Explanation:
In the article "Jordan Davis's Mother: Don't Use My Son's Death to Expand Stand Your Ground" author Lucy McBath describes how people try to get away with law bill because Lucy McBath's son is among many who have been killed because of Stand Your Ground law.
McBath develops the fact that her son's killer spending life time in prison through the provision of Stand Your Ground law is not how justice should be served.
Stating, "Don't you dare use my son's name to justify your support for this reckless bill." This shows that the bill is not to be used as an example of securing justice because the criminal does not really get acquitted with the right punishment.
Furthermore, the author states, "Stand Your Ground laws make all of us more vulnerable to the threat of gun violence, but they also have a disproportionate impact on communities of color."
This evidence develops the central idea because many people use this law as a defence card after they are charged with murder or violence.
In the end, it is all about a mother losing a child to a reckless law which could've been avoided if lawmakers understood the grief of gun violence.
