1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vovikov84 [41]
3 years ago
10

What was the balance between corruption and positive accomplishment by the reconstruction-era state governments in the south? po

sitive → public education system and work programs; 20 blacks serve in us hor between 1869-1901 corruption → segregation in schools and freedmen's bureau took back the land from the blacks and gave it back to the whites; whites unhappy and no black man ever elected governor in southern states between 1869-1901?
History
1 answer:
Vinil7 [7]3 years ago
4 0

The balance between corruption and positive accomplishment by the Reconstruction-era state governments in the South is shown below:

For the positive side: there were public education system and work programs. While 20 black people served in the US HOR between 1869 and 1901.

For the corruption side: there were race segregation in school, and Freedmen’s Bureau took back the lands from the blacks and gave it to the whites. No black man was elected governor in the Southern states between 1869 and 1901.

You might be interested in
Credit card one would be the better option if the borrower
Korolek [52]

Answer:

no

Explanation:

it will be better to borrow because you borrow from card u have to pay tax and borrow u dont

4 0
3 years ago
Where do citizens right come from
mylen [45]
U can look it up on google it’s helps me in social studies
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which battle did the duke of wellington defeat napoleon?
alekssr [168]

In the Battle of Waterloo in 1815.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
___________ gives voters the power to elect senators directly.
nirvana33 [79]
I believe A :)  Good luck!
8 0
3 years ago
Which right is implied by the second admendments right to bear arms?
Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

The right to bear arms ( the 2nd admendment ) means that by no mater what  the government cannot take away our weapons, we have the right to protect our selves using guns

Explanation:

does not apply with criminals

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did education mean for a woman in the late 19th century?
    14·1 answer
  • Describe who makes up each branch of government and the powers of each
    5·2 answers
  • What was the gentlemens agreement?
    13·2 answers
  • What effect did the munich conference have on the spread of the third reich
    7·1 answer
  • . Another name for false productivity is
    9·2 answers
  • The deliberate killing of a large group of people and its culture *
    12·2 answers
  • How did inflation reflect postwar disillusionment or uncertainty in Europe
    9·2 answers
  • This is worth a lot of points!! It is about Lincoln’s FIRST Inaugural Address. Please help i’ll mark brainliest!
    14·1 answer
  • Please hurry, I need help
    7·1 answer
  • ........what about...Life?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!