The question doesn't really make sense, science cannot be debunked with facts because science aims to hypothesize, test, and draw conclusions based off evidence, which has told us what is factual and what is not for the entirety of out existence. How can science even be "wrong" in the way you are putting it? For science as a whole to be wrong would mean we couldn't distinguish reality from fantasy whatsoever. Science isn't wrong if it disproves or discredits someone's beliefs, it is just labeled as biased by the same people who have lived their whole lives believing in a God without ever stopping to think that they might be wrong.
The first ready to where suits/uniforms were for the military in the war of 1812
The Second Barons' War (1264–1267) was a civil war in England between the forces of a number of barons led by Simon de Montfort against the royalist forces of King Henry III, led initially by the king himself and later by his son, the future King Edward I. The barons sought to force the king to rule with a council of barons rather than through his favourites.
It dried up.
North Africa used to be a fertile grassland, even swampy in some spots, 12,000 years ago. By 1000 BC (actually quite a while before) it had dried up into what is the the largest desert i the world: the Sahara.
it tells us how jews had to hide during it ands what they had to experience... i think this is right ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
