Answer:
The correct answer is chronological division.
Explanation:
A chronological order is an order established based on a temporal sequence. The expression is often used to account for real historical events or fictional narratives where events are presented in a virtual temporal order. In an order of this caliber, different facts are expected to be presented in a serial relationship where time divided into past, present and future is the determining factor. For the human mind, the use of a chronological order is important to establish causal relationships, to make phenomena discernible and understandable; indeed, presenting situations in a disorderly manner would make a story a chaotic succession difficult to understand.
Answer: Harder to sustain cooperation
Explanation:
When the number of firms in an oligopolistic market increases as is the case here, cooperation becomes harder because profits become smaller so companies start to become more selfish.
Also in this scenario, the cheating firm has the incentive to do so because the profit is so much higher than sharing so companies will always be looking to cheat in order to make this profit. The other firms would reply by reducing prices and all of them would suffer.
Answer:
The answer is monopoly.
Explanation:
Monopoly is a market type where there is only one producer that is capable of manufacturing a certain product. In this type of market, the producer is capable of producing the smallest amount of products and setting the price that the consumers should pay to purchase the product. The former is possible mainly because the company is capable of knowing how many products do they need to manufacture to achieve the target profit – their sales projection tends to be more accurate than other companies that operate in a different market type.
Ken, the agent, violated the law of agency
In this particular instance, when Ken told the the buyer that the seller would take a lower price than what was on the listing in order to close the sale faster and then told the buyer exactly which price they should offer, Ken, who is the agent, has now violated the law of agency
Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
For February,
Opening inventory would have been:
= 25% of February
= (25% × $89,000)
= $22,250
Ending inventory would have been:
= 25% of March
= (25% × $59,000)
= $14,750
Hence,
Cost of goods sold = Opening inventory + Purchases - Ending inventory
$89,000 = $22,250 + Purchases - $14,750
Purchases = $89,000 + $14,750 - $22,250
= $81,500
Therefore, the budgeted purchases of inventory in February Year 2 would be $81,500.
