The answer to the equation is 8
Using the confidence interval, it is found that the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
<h3>When does a confidence interval for the difference of proportions gives convincing evidence that there is a difference?</h3>
It gives convincing evidence when 0 is not part of the confidence interval.
In this problem, the interval is (0.02, 0.38), which does not contain 0, hence the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
More can be learned about confidence intervals at brainly.com/question/25890103
Answer:
1. 11t
2.7w+28
3. 2c+11
4. 8n
5. 10r+15
6. 24−8g
7. 17d−9
8. 8g+7z
9. 23b
10. 2rs+1
11. 9f+9g
12. 4x+y
13. 21a+14
14. 21a+14
15. 6−3k
16. 18n+36
17. 9s+3t
18. 8a−12b
19. 11m+n
20. 2+6z
21. 8x+6y
22. 7hg−7
23. 4st+5
24. 2r+17
25. 7w+6
26. 3(c+2)
27. 8f−4g
28. 2+8q+3r
Step-by-step explanation:
there you go, sorry it took so long
Perimeter = the addition of all of the side lengths of the polygon.
The side lengths are 9cm, 6cm, 10cm, 5cm, 4cm, and 4cm.
So the perimeter is the following...
Perimeter = 9 + 6 + 10 + 5 + 4 + 4 = 38cm total
9514 1404 393
Answer:
(a) f(x) = √x -2
Step-by-step explanation:
The square root function has no horizontal shift, so the expression under the radical is simply x with no added terms. There is only one such answer choice, which also shows the necessary translation downward by an added negative constant.
