Answer: to be honest, a movie called Padmaavat
Explanation: Although most Bhansali movies are aesthetically pleasing, especially Padmaavat, the way that he writes his characters in this movie are a bit off. Especially in the movie Padmaavat, he writes the character Alauddin Khilji in a more barbaric way, although in real life he was a mild mannered person, and the character Ratan Singh as a calm and collected man. So it seems like as if Bhansali is making Alauddin to be a rogue and barbaric Muslim king and Ratan the righteous and heroic Hindu king. Bhansali also shuts out the fact that Alauddin may have been in a relationship with his slave general Malik Kaufur, and that Alauddin might have even been bi or gay, but in the movie, you see no example of them even being close in a romantic way. So, what I would change is Alauddin’s character, and make him a more proper and calm character and reprsent Alauddin and Malik’s relationship. With the character Padmavati, I feel like that they represented her in a different light. I feel that they didn’t really represent her Sinhalese heritage. Also in the Ghoomar scene, a Rajput queen would probably never dance in front of anyone, they would be watching other dancers. Also the top Deepika wore showed her bosom, which Rajput queens would never show. So, I would try to positively change all the factors I just stated in this paragraph and hope that Sanjay Leela Bhansali will continue to create more beautiful movies.
B because vegetative is trying to be like nature
<span>politics, pleasure, and women
During the classical Greek Era, images on funerary monuments represented leadership roles of men in politics, the different pleasures and comforts of domestic life, and the vital importance and roles of women in Green society. Funerary monuments were traditionally works of art that were formed on or placed in a repository designed for the remains of the deceased.</span>
Moving of a bullock I think
