<span>Competition over wealth and resources--under the theory of mercantilism it was believed there was a limited amount of wealth in the world and power was given to the country that held the most wealth.
Power and wealth are connected under the mercantilism theory. If there is only so much wealth in the world and a country must hold the most wealth to have the most power, then countries would be willing to fight each other for wealth. During the late 15th and early 15th centuries, this theory drove European countries to create colonies and trade connections with Asian Empires. In doing this they believed they were gaining power through the wealth of land and resources.</span>
I would say B, considering the federal government does not make marijuana legal. Therefore, they do not grant the legalization of marijuana. The state laws did make a conflict with their own police by making the legalization movement. Therefore, best guess is on B.
The correct answer is mixed market economy.
A market economy is one in which the economy is completely dictated by the consumers and producers. In this type of economy, the government does not play any type of role.
America does not have a pure market economy, as there is government regulation in our economy. For example, the federal government uses agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission in order to monitor the stock market. Another example would be the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The FDIC regulates financial institutions, like banks.
This is why the US is considered a mixed market economy, because it has elements of a command economy but primarily consists of ideas from the market economy structure.
Answer:
The chief officer of the senate is the lieutenant governor. Unlike the Speaker, who is elected by the members of the house, the lieutenant governor is elected by all the voters of the state.
Explanation:
this is what i could find hope this helps
Answer:
<u>A) If it weren’t for Francis Pizarro’s, the Inca Empire would have continued to expand and prosper.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
We can make this conclusion because throughout the text mention was made about Francis Pizarro's role in the Inca Empire.
For example, after stating the might and glory of the Inca empire had, the author stated, <em>"Once Pizarro had executed the last emperor, the empire rapidly collapsed." </em>In other words, If it weren’t for Francis Pizarro’s, the Inca Empire would have continued to expand and prosper.
