Answer:
it is C because it talks about professional
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question this seems to be an example of the loss of professional autonomy. This term refers to the ability of a professional being independent and self-directing, mostly in making decisions, as it gives professionals the ability to make judgement calls based on their beliefs and experience. Since in this situation the professionals are not given the freedom to initiate courses of action then we can say that they have lost their professional autonomy.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "As we never think about gap or distance as negative, so it must be written as a positive number".
Explanation:
- On a number line, the absolute value of such a term or a number is the size of the number from zero. Because we've never discussed range as negative, his value of a number is almost always positive. Think about it as the number of leaps it might require to get it from a number to null.
- Whether the feedback was either positive or negative or null, it might have a positive outcome or a null.
Therefore, it's the right answer.
<span>Factors such as not having the sufficient money to
afford the tuition and not having the necessary connections to get into the
institution. The former is explainable because tertiary education is really
costly and the latter is not knowing who to ask or get in touch when applying
for the institution.</span>
Answer:
The trustee can stop Alex from selling the house and that automatically prevent the transfer of ownership from Alex to his brother Jonah.
Explanation:
The trustee will refute the transfer and take back the house as part of Alex's estate. The reason for this is not far fetched, Alex actions in this regards is tantamount to an abuse of chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy law. In that case, the trustees can use the "means test" to determine his actions and can stop the transfer of ownership to his brother, Jonah.
Because of people like Alex, US trustees has achieved a regulatory system most creditor friendly commentators have consistently espoused, which is a formal means test for Chapter 7. (The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) has clarified this area of concern.
