1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxMikexx [17]
3 years ago
6

Which of the following is one factor that led to the signing of the Magna Carta?

History
2 answers:
bulgar [2K]3 years ago
8 0
The answer is probably D
Law Incorporation [45]3 years ago
6 0
The D OR B (I’m pretty sure it’s one of them)
You might be interested in
How did the September 11 attacks affect New York City
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

The September 11 attack in New York had such a catastrophic effect on the city...

1) People suggest that about 3,000 lives were lost just in the attack on the ground

2) In the WTC (World Trade Centre) about 2,763 died when two hijacked aircraft rammed into the Twin Towers

3) The mailing of letters containing Anthrax sparked fears of infections and deaths *it killed 2 and infected about 17* so from then on security measures were to be significantly increased...

4) Immediate economic impacts such as the crash of The New York Stock Exchange as trading market fell 7.1%

5) About 143,000 people lost their jobs day after day...

6) The destruction of the Twin Towers cost the US Government $60 BILLION...

Explanation:

<u>HERE ARE JUST SOME OF THE SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF THE 9/11 ATTACKS ON NEW YORK CITY</u>

HOPE THIS HELPS!!

7 0
3 years ago
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
A horse run 10 meters going south​
lara [203]
Well I’m not sure what the question is asking but you can run 0.83 seconds per 10 meters.
7 0
2 years ago
Someone help please ​
Tasya [4]
A.Acculturation good luck
5 0
3 years ago
Homework! PLEASE HELP!!
levacccp [35]

Answer:

D.forigen countries refusing to buy american goods.

Explanation:

Gogle is my explanation

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Republican form of government was invented by ​
    11·1 answer
  • How does Jefferson show the colonies are not acting on impulse in the declaration of independence
    15·1 answer
  • Why were west African empires prosperous
    14·1 answer
  • What change and government policy took place at the end of world war one
    5·2 answers
  • In what way was the Oregon trail part of manifest destiny
    14·2 answers
  • What were Britain and France doing that caused Jefferson to place an embargo
    6·1 answer
  • Who was barred from receiving the GI bill benifits?
    15·2 answers
  • What were the Five Year Plans?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the Red cloud war happen?
    8·2 answers
  • Which document established the United States ’first government?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!