Answer:
$62,100
Explanation:
Given that,
Sales price per unit = $ 40
Variable costs per unit:
Manufacturing = $ 23
Marketing and administrative = $ 8
Total fixed costs:
Manufacturing = $ 76,000
Marketing and administrative = $24,000
Total incremental costs:
= Variable manufacturing + Variable marketing and administrative
= (6,900 × $23) + (6,900 × $8)
= $158,700 + $55,200
= $213,900
Incremental income:
= Incremental revenue - Total incremental costs
= (6,900 × $40) - $213,900
= $276,000 - $213,900
= $62,100
Therefore, the operating income increases by $62,100.
If the federal gasoline tax increases to $1 per gallon, the gasoline price rises, demand for bicycles shifts rightward.
Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
If the price of gasoline increases, then probably there will be a decrease in the consumption of the same as a result of which the demand for the substitute product, bicycle increases.
Demand curve a graphical representation of changes in the product or service demanded along with the changes in the cost or price of the service or product. Increase in the demand for a product, is generally represented by the rightward shift in the demand curve.
The correct answer in the space provided is the total
quality management. The total quality management is where it is responsible for
causing an improvement in regards of improving the ability of an organization
or group in a way of delivering their services or products to their consumers.
Solution :
We calculate the advances form the customer to be reported as the current liability as on Dec. 31, 2009 in the balance sheet as follows :
<u> Particulars </u> <u> Amount ($)</u>
Customer advances the balance Dec 31, 2008 110
Add : advances that is received with 2009 orders is 195
Less : advances applicable to the orders in 2009 -180
Less : advances from orders that are canceled in 2009 <u> -45 </u>
Advances from the customers liability Dec. 31, 2009 80
Therefore, the advance from the customer to be reported in the balance sheet as the current liability is $80.
Answer:
The equilibrium expected rate of return is higher for Kaskin than for Quinn.
Explanation:
Option A “The equilibrium expected rate of return is higher for Kaskin than for Quinn” is more accurate because the expected return is calculated by multiplying the risk premium with beta value and then adding with risk-free return. However, if the beta value is high, then the magnitude after multiplying with the risk premium will be high. Moreover, is magnitude will be added to risk-free return to find the expected return. Thus, it can be seen that Kaskin has high beta 1.2 as compared to Quinn’s beta value 0.6. So, the Kaskin has a higher expected return.
