Hello!
Redundancy of language means when something is repeated more than once in a sentence.
1. The answer cannot be A because "wily" is a synonym of "clever". The sentence is therefore saying: "The clever, clever con artist..."
2. The answer is B because "wily" and "smiling" are two different words with different meaning. Nothing is repeated in this sentence.
3. The answer cannot be C because "grinning" and "smiling are synonyms.
4. The answer also cannot be D because "smart" and "intelligent" are synonyms.
I hope this helps you! Have a lovely day!
- Mal
The most likely answer to this question would be offensive. If a comment is culturally insensitive, it's one that may be considered offensive to certain groups or culture. Offensive would be the nearest to what is the most appropriate term to fill in the missing word or phrase in this sentence. Insensitivity usually leads to the other party, usually the receiver of the insensitivity, to being hurt, damaged, or broken. When this happens, conflict usually rises from it. When the deliverer of insensitivity isn't aware of what he has done, then it would just fan the conflict which results to it becoming worse and might harbour worse effects to both parties.
<span>The overriding idea in any piece of fiction is known as its. The overriding idea in any piece of fiction is known as its.</span>
Answer:
B. Had great value
Explanation:
The words that are underlined in sentence 2 are <em>were really cool. </em>This type of language, which we usually use in everyday conversations with our friends, isn't used in informational texts, i.e. texts that give us information about a certain topic. Instead, we should use more formal language. The best substitute would be the words<em> </em><em>had great value.</em><em> </em>
Option A is incorrect because it also contains informal language (<em>totally useful - very useful</em> would be better).
Option C also isn't formal enough (<em>had a ton of uses - had many uses</em> is a better version).
Option D is incorrect because the given combination of words isn't correct. Something can't be <em>way important</em>. It can just be <em>very important.</em>
This is why option B is correct.
Answer:
A. A comparison of three universities
Explanation: