Answer:
Hi!
Explanation:
Thank You So Much For The Points.
Explanation:
the question does not have an answer probably what they have in common
Answer:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main() {
int num, check=0;
for(int num = 1; num<=100;num++){
for(int i = 2; i <= num/2; i++) {
if(num % i == 0)
{
check=1;
break; } }
if (check==0) { cout <<num<<" "; }
check = 0;
}
return 0;
}
Explanation:
This line declares num as integer which represents digits 1 to 100.
A check variable is declared as integer and initialized to 0
<em> int num, m=0, check=0;
</em>
This for loop iterates from 1 to 100
for(int num = 1; num<=100;num++){
This iterates from 2 to half of current digit
for(int i = 2; i <= num/2; i++) {
This checks for possible divisors
if(num % i == 0)
{
If found, the check variable is updated to 1
check=1;
And the loop is terminated
break; } }
The following if statement prints the prime numbers
if (check==0) { cout <<num<<" "; }
check = 0;
}
Answer:
The method in Java is as follows:
public static int numUnique(int list[]) {
int unique = 1;
for (int i = 1; i < list.length; i++) {
int j = 0;
for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
if (list[i] == list[j])
break;
}
if (i == j)
unique++;
}
return unique;
}
Explanation:
This line defines the numUnique method
public static int numUnique(int list[]) {
This initializes the number of unique elements to 1
int unique = 1;
This iterates through the list
for (int i = 1; i < list.length; i++) {
The following iteration checks for unique items
int j = 0;
<em> for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
</em>
<em> if (list[i] == list[j]) </em><em>If current element is unique, break the iteration</em><em>
</em>
<em> break; </em>
<em> }
</em>
if (i == j)
unique++;
}
This returns the number of unique items in the list
return unique;
}
Answer:
This exercise includes the following question and options:
What is the logical error in the coded query?
A) <em>The condition in the WHERE clause should be coded in the HAVING clause.</em>
B) <em>The column name for the fifth column in the result set doesn't match the data.</em>
C) <em>The three columns in the ORDER BY clause should use the DESC keyword so the city totals will be in the right sequence.</em>
D) <em>The condition in the HAVING clause should be coded in the WHERE clause.</em>
And from the options provided, the error is in the 5th column, due to the column name in that result series/group doesn't really coincide with the data, thereby the correct option is <em>B)</em>.
