Hi. Unfortunately I was unable to access the article this question refers to. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
We can see that the view that Chicago is “…at the forefront of the green-roof movement” is refuted, with the phrase showing that Germany has a much larger amount of green roofs than Chicago. This shows that Chicago does not deserve the title of "forefront" in the use of these roofs, as there are places, such as Germany, that have taken the lead in this attitude.
Unfortunately, without reading the article it is not possible to know how it affects the general tone and mood of the article. However, considering that this is an informative article, we can consider that this rebuttal, presents the feeling that green roofs are something that is being established very slowly in America, even though this is a very beneficial attitude for society. Furthermore, this rebuttal may present a delayed mood, as it shows that America is late in implementing this technology. This can be seen because the tone and mood of a text establish the sensation and feeling that the author of the article wants to promote through reading.
In order to make your ideas and support for your ideas of the argument you are claiming.
Answer:
According to Thoreau, people who have the ability to serve the State without corrupting their conscience and maintain the ability to question government decisions as well as resist oppression caused by the government should be considered heroes.
Explanation:
Thoreau believed that heroes were essential for civil disobedience to be effective in the country. This was because for him it was necessary for citizens to be loyal to themselves and to be able to defend their concepts about what was right within society. For him, heroes totally fit that statement, because they were people who served the State, but remained true to their own beliefs.
This is because the heroes, even serving the State, were not corrupted by government benefits, but maintained their conscience and had the courage to question the State's decisions without fear of possible oppression.
Answer:
hope this helps ( i am not very clever so if it doesn't help, please delete this answer)
Explanation:
1) "'lady, i am sorry' whisper the boy"
2) "dragging the frightened boy behind her"
These both show how the boy is scared. in the first examples, the boy whispers which show that he could be trembling. the second example, (which isn't a good example) show that he is scared of the woman. the woman seems to want the boy to be scared and she doesn't have any respect for the poor boy, this is also shown in the line "she did not release him".
Answer:
I don't think the the art was good during 1917
Explanation:
