Question

Nathan and Jordan design surveys to determine the average amount of time bicyclists in a race spend training each week. Nathan surveys every fifth bicyclist crossing the finish line after a race. Jordan surveys the first five bicyclists to finish the race. Which best explains which sample is likely to be the most valid?
Nathan’s because his sample was more random
Jordan’s because his sample was more random
Nathan’s because his sample contained elements of the population
Jordan’s because his sample contained elements of the population

Answer 1

Answer:

A

Nathan's because his sample was more random

Step-by-step explanation:

Nathan's survey could be described as a Systematic random sampling technique whereby every 5th observation taken as a sample from the population. With these technique we have a more random observation than with

Brainliest plz if im right

Hope this work

Answer 2

I believe Nathan was more valid