The answer is '3/5 Compromise' - which was was an agreement reached between Northern and Southern states during the Constitutional Convention. It was a method of calculating the population of slaves into the apportionment of the House of Representatives and distribution of taxes.
It was an agreement between those <em>who were against slavery</em>, and those<em> who supported slavery</em>. As slaves could not vote, their masters represented them.
<em>It potentially infringed on American's civil liberties.</em>
D would be the most appropriate. C and B would be very bias, especially since C was written by a general in World War II, meaning that it would only be his point of view and not the other argument. D, is by a trustworthy newspaper columnist (since it's popular) who has read both books and written a view on both which would most likely not be very bias.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Nathan Hale was an American Patriot, soldier and spy for the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War. He volunteered for an intelligence-gathering mission in New York City but was captured by the British and executed
<span>southern gothic writers</span>
<span />
