I believe the answer is: their growth mind-set.
The growth mind-set refers to the belief that all skills/abilities can be developed as long as people are willing to put in their effort and dedication.
Insulting the students when they have a bad test results could damage their confidence and discourage them to try to put more effort in the future. Praising their effort on the other hand would make the students feel good about it and make them more likely to put more effort in the future.
A cultural system creates a unique world that is experienced as "reality" by its members. The people of a certain culture come to accept the "realities" which form its culture.
However, when groups of different cultures come together, their "realities" become confronted. Creating a clash of cultures. The outcome of this clash is decided by the material power of each of this groups. The group with the most material will emerge victoriously and end up influencing the other group with its cultural system. Therefore, individuals from the influenced culture will end up learning a new "reality" by force. On the other hand, individuals of the influencing culture tend to see the others as "objects of study".
Clashes of cultures have been occurring throughout time, affecting the cultural authenticity of groups. Due to the constant blend of cultures, it is nowadays, very difficult to consider that a certain cultural group is "truly authentic".
<span>The river’s predictability and the fertile soil allowed the Egyptians to build an empire on the basis of great agricultural wealth.</span>
Chavez is most likely in favor of the Cannon-Bard Theory, as he's advocating that emotions can not be associated to specific physiological changes. When he points out that the autonomic nervous system is functioning simultaneously and isn't the cause for the variation in emotional responses, he's most likely talking about the Cannon-Bard Theory.
