Answer:
I believe is because they were not unsatisfied with Great Britain and it's acts on the Colony.
Explanation:
When we analyze the American Revolution and look at each side, it's common to interpret their relationship based on the concept of good against evil, or good actions and bad actions. However, we forget that the war was fought by common people, with their motivations. And that's the case of Loyalists. <em><u>They were not unsatisfied with Great Britain</u></em>, maybe <em><u>because they were wealthy enough; or because they believed that Great Britain's actions were normal. </u></em>Or because they didn't believed that the <u><em>fight against England was not only unnecessary but wrong.</em></u>
Democracy, security, strong economy
Answer:
The "liberal consensus" was the tacit agreement between the Democratic and Republican Parties in the United States Congress during the 1960s, through which they would support and approve bills related to social security, with the aim of guaranteeing better and greater rights to American citizens.
These policies were mainly promoted by Democratic politicians, who held the majority of the presidency during that decade through John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson. But many moderate Republicans also supported these measures, being led by, among others, Nelson Rockefeller, then-Governor of New York, who drew support from East Coast Republicans for many of the Democratic Party measures.
Mexico won its indpendence from Spain on Sep 16, 1810.
Loyalist believed that it was their duty to follow the King's laws and rules, so what ever law the King and they would follow it with out a question
