Answer: Leave Sonic alone
Explanation: Gotta go fast
Im gonna say that the answer is A. The New Deal did a lot of good during the Great Depression, but im not sure if it lifted the depression in 2 years
Okay, so here are the leaders according to my bad memory...John Jay, Rufus King,DeWitt Clinton, Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, and I forgot the last one. I dont know, maybe Im wrong. Good luck! ;D
Answer:
The historical circumstances that led to the Industrial Revolution was the first World War. After the first world war, the world was desparate to create new inventions and leave behind their old ways. Some of the first inventions after the war were Television and Fighter Planes. This was a political endeavor because there were many who did not want to see change happen, but the conservatives are known for driving progress forward and sparking innovation. The economic effects were grave as the industrial revolution that took place after world war one directly led to the great depression of the 1940s. The social effects meant that people were more disconnected than ever, no one ever left their home they did their shopping on qvc, and we have seen a decline in society ever since.
Explanation:
This is an analysis of the political and economic benefits of the Industrial Revolution.
Answer:
“I do think that if there were a long term—I don’t know, 18, 20 years, something like that, and it was fixed—I would say that was fine. In fact, it’d make my life a lot simpler, to tell you the truth.” – Justice Stephen Breyer1
“The Framers adopted life tenure at a time when people simply did not live as long as they do now. A judge insulated from the normal currents of life for twenty-five or thirty years was a rarity then, but is becoming commonplace today. Setting a term of, say, fifteen years would ensure that federal judges would not lose all touch with reality through decades of ivory tower existence. It would also provide a more regular and greater degree of turnover among the judges. Both developments would, in my view, be healthy ones.” – Future Chief Justice John Roberts2
The rules governing the U.S. Supreme Court must be updated to reflect the reality of life in modern America. The average tenure of a Supreme Court justice has significantly lengthened since the establishment of the federal judiciary in the 1700s, giving outsize power to nine individuals in a way the framers of the Constitution could never have imagined. This longevity has resulted in a lack of regularity in vacancies, introducing further randomness to the judicial selection process. As a result, the confirmation process for the highest court has become politically divisive, with extremely narrow votes and theatrics from the nominees themselves. This state of affairs is untenable; policymakers must address it by enacting legislation to create term limits for justices.
