This part of the speech is effective since it conveys Britain's confidence in their Navy and the possibility of winning the war, as further explained below.
<h3>What is the purpose of the speech?</h3>
The speech "Their Finest Hour" by Winston Churchill has the purpose of conveying the idea that it is possible for Britain to win the war. For that reason, the part of the speech that we are analyzing here is effective. It implies that the British Navy deserves to be trusted, whereas Italy's and Germany's are not as good they they used to be.
Therefore, this part of the speech helps compose the speech as whole and serves as another point or argument in the process of claiming that Britain can win the war. The speech is, thus, inspiring and reassuring, as is its purpose.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided above is correct.
Learn more about purpose here:
brainly.com/question/10336721
#SPJ1
Speare has been more feted in print than ever, in the mainstream as well as in the overflowing and sometimes murky underground river of academic publications. "Enough!" we may well cry (as we sometimes cry at the unending proliferation of productions of the plays). Not, however, in the case of Sir Frank Kermode, whose profoundly conceived and elegantly executed Shakespeare's Language (2000) was a complex but luminous contribution to the understanding of the greatest single body of dramatic work in any language, one of the most refreshing in recent times; any new commentary from him on the subject is eagerly awaited. Despite a brief flirtation with structuralism, he is no grand theorist. Instead, he is that rather old-fashioned phenomenon: a
Answer:
after my curfew to be replaced with past my curfew
Explanation:
stay past curfew
<span>The text:
81) This unbridled preaching of indulgences makes it difficult even for learned men to rescue the reverence which is due the pope from slander or from the shrewd questions of the laity. 82) Such as: ``Why does not the pope empty purgatory for the sake of holy love and the dire need of the souls that are there if he redeems an infinite number of souls for the sake of miserable money with which to build a church?'' The former reason would be most just; the latter is most trivial.
Martin Luther is making the point that grace is a much better reason for saving souls from purgatory than paying money, and that to say otherwise goes against the core tenants of Christianity, which views money as dangerous and corrupting, and grace and mercy as the virtues that everyone should strive for and that define Christ. </span><span />
