1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sveta_85 [38]
3 years ago
15

Which explains why Romans were upset by the emperor's decision to create more coins?

History
1 answer:
NARA [144]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Romans were upset by the emperor´sdecision to create more coins because they needed more coins to buy the same amount of food as before.

You might be interested in
So put you best face on everybody pretend you know this song
julsineya [31]

Is this to help people feel better and be happy?

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
IDENTIFYING What can you tell about the way the narrator lives from his description of the
Lorico [155]

The narrator of the Aztec Account of the Conquest of Mexico is Miguel Leon Portilla.

<h3>What method did the Aztecs use to conquer Mexico?</h3>

They captured Emperor Motecuzoma II, who died in 1520 following a conflict between Spanish soldiers and Tenochtitlan people.

The Aztecs quickly drove the conquistadors from the capital, but Cortés assembled a small fleet of ships, besieged Tenochtitlan, and starved the city to death in 1521.

<h3>What impact did the Spanish invasion of Mexico have on the Aztecs?</h3>

Because they helped modernize the Aztec society, the Spanish had a favorable impact on Aztec civilization.

They introduced domestic b, sugar, wheat, and European farming methods to the Aztecs. Most notably, the Spanish abolished the Aztec ritual of human sacrifice.

Learn more about Aztecs:
brainly.com/question/14450399
#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
1.Who might want his electronic devices to come preprogrammed?
Bad White [126]

Answer:

e=mc2

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Letter from Birmingham Jail Assignment
solniwko [45]

Answer:

Considering the context of its creation, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is remarkably restrained in tone. Throughout his career, many critics of Dr. King argued that he was too deferential to the white authorities that facilitated segregation and other racist policies, but the tone here seems to serve several purposes. First, it conforms to his ultimate purpose of justifying his cause as being in the name of justice. He does not wish to validate his audience’s deep-seeded fears - that the black movement is an extremist set that will engender violence. Therefore, by utilizing restraint, he earns a sympathetic ear to which he then declares his proud embrace of extremism and tension. His difficult arguments end up practically unimpeachable precisely because he has presented them through logos as well as through pathos. However, the restraint also allows him to reinforce one of the letter’s central themes, the interconnectedness of man. There are times when he distinguishes himself and his cause from that of his opponents, particularly in terms of race. However, he for the most part suggests that all men are responsible for all others, an idea that would not be as effective if the tone of the argument was too fiery and confrontational.

Explanation:

Considering it was written in a situation so infused with racial issues, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is often strangely divorced from explicitly racial issues. Obviously, Dr. King cannot avoid the topic, but much of his argument, especially in the letter’s first half, is presented in universalist terms and through abstractions like “justice” and the interrelatedness of man. He argues that the clergymen, and his larger audience, should support his cause not because the victims are black but because it is the right thing to do. However, this passionate but restrained argument ultimately sets the stage for a declaration of what scholar Jonathan Rieder calls “a proclamation of black self-sufficiency” (94). Once he establishes the definitions of justice and morality, Dr. King argues that the black man will succeed with or without the help of white moderates because they operate with the just ideals of both secular America and divine guidance. Further, he implicitly suggests that by continuing to facilitate the oppression of the black man through moderation, his audience is operating in sin and will ultimately be on the losing side.

In Dr. King’s argument, moderation is a reflection of the moderate’s ignorant and unwitting sinfulness. In terms of the former, the white moderate operates under an illusion that patience will be more effective towards ending segregation than tension will be. Through a variety of legally-structured arguments, Dr. King illustrates the fallacy of both these assumptions. He argues that moderation is but a handy disguise for cowards who fear upsetting the status quo more than desire to pursue justice. However, because he stipulates that his audience is ostensibly interested in the virtue of justice, he argues that moderation allows them license to live in a sinfulness of inaction. To view the suffering of others but to remain silent facilitates a world where men are “separate,” which he equates with sinfulness. Through a variety of unambiguous comparisons – the just crusader to Jesus, and the moderates to those who did not protect the Jews of Nazi Germany – Dr. King decries moderation as the largest obstacle towards equal rights in America at the time.

One recurring idea that supports Dr. King’s arguments is that group mentality supports and enables immorality, and that the individual must therefore act for justice even when the group does not share that goal. He makes this point explicitly in the early part of the “Letter.” This argument supports his defense of civil disobedience, allows him to criticize the church for supporting the status quo rather than empowering crusaders for change, and supports the idea that law must reflect morality since it might otherwise be designed solely for the comfort of the majority. Overall, the discussion of group immorality supports his purpose of encouraging individual action in the face of injustice, and criticizing those who do not support such individual action for fear of upsetting the status quo.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Which president began the modern presidency in which the trend of presidential decision making assumed greater importance tha
ch4aika [34]

Some might say FDR, some might say LBJ, others might say Nixon. The reality is that the power of the Legislative vis a vis the Executive is in constant flux.


In terms of sweeping policy initiatives FDR's administration might be the time when the Presidency took on many of its contemporary roles. The activism of the LBJ administration was a further expansion of the New Deal-era role of the FDR administration. LBJ also was arguably the first president to use the US armed forces in foreign engagements without Congress declaring war (Gulf of Tonkin resolution)--a precedent we have become all too familiar with. In terms of 'imperial pretensions' Nixon assumed all the New Deal, Great Society, civil rights activism, and the ability to intervene militarily of the preceding Presidencies and expanded them to include unfettered use of the CIA and FBI.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was karl marx so angered and disillusioned ny the ndustrial revolution?
    7·1 answer
  • What are two reasons why US president Dwight Eisenhower provided full support to the leader Ngo Dinh Diem in South Vietnam?
    11·2 answers
  • What is protection money?????
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the colonies meet for the Albany Congress, Albany, NY?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of these was not a civil war battle? battle of gettysburg battle of shiloh battle of the bulge the first battle of bull ru
    9·1 answer
  • What are 5 international Cold War events
    10·1 answer
  • What happened at the First Battle of Bull Run that revealed how the average Northerner first viewed this war?
    10·1 answer
  • What factor encouraged many states to vote for ratification.
    10·1 answer
  • Jingoism was a Group of answer choices late-19th century form of commercialism. type of super-patriotism that took hold in the l
    14·1 answer
  • Think about the writing prompt. Which side will you discuss in your argumentative essay?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!