The answer is "the social-conflict approach".
The social conflict approach is a way to deal with social theory that contends that society is described by different disparities and clashes that reason individuals to act socially, delivering change.
Society, according to the social conflict approach, isn't amicable. It's not steady. Society doesn't create agreeable balance. Truth be told, it's overflowing with imbalance. So this methodology is extremely about investigating imbalances of race, class, sexual orientation, and ethnicity, and the social clashes which result. Basically, these contentions will result in change, changes that will move society.
Answer:
One of the most common criticisms of Stanley Milgram’s studies of obedience is that the results of his experiment do not represent actual tendencies to obey the authority due to the participants of it probably knowing everything was okay, another example is that it has been considered in an unethical study in which he had lied to the respondents.
Explanation:
Answer:
D. The Founders decide that political parties make governing more efficient and effective.
Explanation:
They decided to do this so that people will pick a side in who to side with in picking a President. That is why the Founders split it into two groups and it is still that way today.
Answer: The purpose of laws is rules of conduct, usually found enacted in the form of statutes that regulate relationships between people and also between parties
Explanation:
hope this helps :D
