1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nadusha1986 [10]
3 years ago
10

What part of the Secret Treaty at Velasco did many Texans dislike? How do you feel about the decision? Why?

History
2 answers:
amid [387]3 years ago
3 0
The public treaty was to be published immediately, and the secret agreement was to be carried into execution when the public treaty had been fulfilled. The public treaty, with ten articles, provided that hostilities would cease, that Santa Anna would not again take up arms against Texas, that the Mexican forces would withdraw beyond the Rio Grande, that restoration would be made of property confiscated by Mexicans, that prisoners would be exchanged on an equal basis, that Santa Anna would be sent to Mexico as soon as possible, and that the Texas army would not approach closer than five leagues to the retreating Mexicans. In the secret agreement, in six articles, the Texas government promised the immediate liberation of Santa Anna on condition that he use his influence to secure from Mexico acknowledgment of Texas independence; Santa Anna promised not to take up arms against Texas, to give orders for withdrawal from Texas of Mexican troops, to have the Mexican cabinet receive a Texas mission favorably, and to work for a treaty of commerce and limits specifying that the Texas boundary not lie south of the Rio Grande.
Mashcka [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Many Texans were angry that the Treaty provided that Santa Anna would be allowed to live and return to Mexico. They wanted revenge for the hundreds of Texans ruthlessly slaughtered under his command at the Alamo and Goliad. I agree that Santa Anna should not have been permitted to live after commanding such ruthless slaughters of Texans. For example, the people at Goliad were told they would be released if they cooperated but they were massacred. He was not a good leader for the Mexican people either and had a history of false promises and poor relationships. or I agree with the decision made at the negotiations to allow a Santa Anna to live and return to Mexico. The Texans needed Santa Ann to follow through with his agreement to make sure Mexico recognized Texas as a free republic and set the border at the Rio Grande.

Explanation:

that is the possible answer I did it on edge

You might be interested in
What were the economic motivations for the Dutch colony of New Netherlands
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

The primary motivation for Dutch settlement of this area was financial—the country wanted to add to its treasury. To this end, Dutch traders formed powerful alliances with Native Americans based on the trade of beaver pelts and furs. Farmers and merchants followed.

Motivations for colonization:

  • The French colonized North America to form exchanging posts for the hide exchange.
  • A few French teachers in the long run made their way to North America in arrange to convert Native Americans to Catholicism.
  • The first aim of Dutch colonization was to discover a way to Asia through North America, but after finding the hide exchange productive, the Dutch claimed the range of Unused Netherlands.
  • The original intent of Dutch colonization was to find a path to Asia through North America, but after finding the fur trade profitable, the Dutch claimed the area of New Netherlands.

To know more about motivation of Dutch colony visit :

brainly.com/question/1275434

#SPJ9

5 0
1 year ago
Which statements apply to the Middle Kingdom?
Alchen [17]
<span>I cant stand brainly they removed my account i had ONE warning i hope you see this brainly shove a big one up there and remove this account too</span>
3 0
3 years ago
The greatest achievement of the Antifederalists was to
Vsevolod [243]

A, I checked on usa test prep

8 0
3 years ago
How was whiskey rebellion different from shay's rebellion?
mrs_skeptik [129]

Difference between Shays' and Whiskey: Shays' rebellion was under the Articles of Confederation and the weak government and was unable to support, with force, the state of MA in order to aid in the defeat of the rebellion. The Whiskey Rebellion, under the Constitution, it became evident that the government was capable of enforcing the law.

6 0
3 years ago
Which government program, begun during the New Deal, still exists today?
marissa [1.9K]
It would be the "a. Social Security Administration" that was begun during the New Deal and still exists today, since many people rely on this in order to retire later in life. 
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do you think Native Americans might disagree with the word "Discovered" in this statement?
    9·1 answer
  • The United States increases the money supply, deflating the value of the dollar. As a result, people in other countries can purc
    5·1 answer
  • Help please!!!
    10·2 answers
  • A) Nomme une théorie scientifique actuelle qui tente
    10·1 answer
  • Probate courts handle appeals to lower court rulings true or false ?
    8·1 answer
  • Which parties in U.S. history favor strong state governments?
    9·1 answer
  • 8. Identify three improvements made in transportation during the period of Westward Expansion. How did these innovations impact
    13·1 answer
  • What was the attitude of many factory owners toward their workers?
    8·2 answers
  • Who was Nathaniel Bacon, and how did he play a part in the conflict between the eastern and western parts of Virginia?
    7·1 answer
  • Please help i’ll give brainlist
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!