In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
Answer:
Hallucinations
Explanation:
Hallucinations are sensory experiences which seem actual, but which our mind creates and can affect all of our five senses. For example, seeing objects that are not there, hearing voices, experiencing body sensations or detecting odors that are not there. In other words, it refers to the sensory sensations that aren't triggered by the sensory organ. The popular culture of the 1960s was characterized by the use of various drugs to explore new ways of pleasure and the result was hallucination cases.
There was a treaty that gave them about 525,000 square miles of land
Answer:
They found silk and other resources in Asia during the crusades
Explanation:
