I'm thinking this is what the problem looks like:

. The first thing to do is to move the

over to the other side because it has a common denominator with the other side. Doing that and at the same time combining them over their common denominator looks like this:

. The best way to solve for x now is to cross-multiply to get 3(4-x)=-4(x-4). Distributing through the parenthesis is 12 - 3x = -4x + 16. Solving for x gives us x = 4. Of course when we sub a 4 back in for x we get real problems, don't we? Dividing by zero breaks every rule in math that there ever was! So, yes, the solution is extraneous.
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
There are two values for x=0
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 67
Variance = 3.85
We have to find 80% confidence interval for the population variance of the weights.
Degree of freedom = 67 - 1 = 66
Level of significance = 0.2
Chi square critical value for lower tail =

Chi square critical value for upper tail =

80% confidence interval:

Putting values, we get,

Thus, (3.13,4.91) is the required 80% confidence interval for the population variance of the weights.