The Battle of Bunker Hill in 1775 was considered a victory for the Continental army because

History

2 answers:

kolezko [41]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The British army sustained heavy casualties, is the right answer.

Explanation:

The most important battle of the American Revolution was the Battle of Bunker Hill. Though the British won the battle, the continental army under General George Washington successfully captured and fortify Dorchester Heights and push the British to flee Boston and the Harbor. Furthermore, the heavy losses caused on the British during the Clash strengthened the determination of Americans and determined that the relatively unskilled colonists could surely struggle on par with the great redcoats of the British Army.

bonufazy [111]2 years ago

4 0

The British Army sustained many casualties.

You might be interested in

Alexander hamilton believed government should be run by the wealthy and powerful. he was a leader in what political party? whigs

mylen [45]

Hamilton wanted a strong central governmwnt. Hamilton was a federalist.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What changed following the end of feudalism/manorialism and how did that contribute to the Renaissance?

Yuri [45]

Explanation:

Feudalism was a social structure rooted in an exchange of land for military service. It was directed by the aristocracy, who were the landowners of the time. Land is the common element in both systems. Feudalism dictated how nobles gained it, while manorialism mapped out how that land was maintained by peasants.

5 0

2 years ago

The Arabian peninsula is in the heart of the world and connects to the following continents

m_a_m_a [10]

Answer:

Africa, Europe and Asia

7 0

2 years ago

Which of these is an example of using a network to communicate an idea? A) reading the news on the internet B) watching an onlin

Veronika [31]

D. sending a text messages on your cell phone
hope this helps

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Did john marshall go beyond the constitution when he applied judicial review in marbury

BaLLatris [955]

Numerous originalists would reply "yes," on the grounds that legal audit isn't listed as an energy of the Judicial Branch in the Constitution.

Then again, the legal audit was at that point a setup training when the Constitution was composed, and the Framers, a significant number of whom were attorneys with information of court method, didn't expressly disallow it. Article III makes no say of how the Judicial Branch should practice statute. The absence of direction has a tendency to infer the Framers deliberately permitted adaptability and a level of independence in deciding the courts' operation. In the event that they had no aim for the Judicial Branch to go about as a mind the energy of the other two branches, they could have set more unequivocal rules for the legal to take after.

5 0

3 years ago