Napoleon Bonaparte had a contradictory character. He had an unusual personality. The writer Germaine de Staël described him as being ‘neither good nor violent, neither gentle nor cruel’, which denotes that he was <em>neutral</em>, a<em> calm </em>and <em>calculated/prudent </em>person. he was considered<em> unique </em>and <em>very special </em>for the actions he took and the thinking he put into taking decisions. By the French writer Stendhal, he was seen as <em>very </em><span><em>ambitious</em> (''endowed with amazing abilities and a dangerous ambition’'). He was very <em>firm</em> when it was about facing his <span>opponents. Even more, he could get even mad when his passions had to face disputes. He was a very difficult person, but that made him more <em>powerful </em>than the others. Also, it is said that ''his diversity (<em>diverse</em>) made him <em>fascinating''</em>. He was hostile to his older brother. He had a military, legislative and <span>diplomatic talent. |He was<em> popular</em>, but his more of defects were: picky (<span>squeamish), selfish, egocentric.</span></span></span></span>
Iceland is the most isolated because it is separated from the others by a larger distance across the ocean, and by deep ocean crust rather than just submerged continental shelf
Answer:yr
Explanation:
yrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
D. contain relevant information
Authoritative sources are works known to be reliable and highly trusted because its authenticity is extensively recognized by experts. Once your source is reliable, the information you need is certainly relevant to your study.
Authoritative sources could be up to date and have thoughtful opinions, however, any sources could have this too.
Any articles are easy to find simply by using the internet. But the question is, are they reliable?
