Which of the following choices has been a continual source of Indian protest music since ancient times?

History

1 answer:

madam [21]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The answer is "women's rights"

Explanation:

A protest song is a tune that is related with a development for social change and thus part of the more extensive class of effective tunes (or tunes associated with recent developments). It could be society, traditional, or business in type.

Among social developments that have a related assemblage of tunes are the cancellation of movement, women's suffrage, human right movement, the common liberties development, social equality, the counter war development and 1960s nonconformity, the women's activist development, the sexual transformation, the gay rights development, basic entitlements development, vegetarianism and veganism, weapon control, and environmentalism.

protest songs are frequently situational, having been related with a social development through setting.

You might be interested in

chase had played video games for 18 minutes before his mother told him that he had used 30% of his total time allowed. What is t

N76 [4]

His time is an hour. You can guess and check by using numbers and seeing what 30% of them is

6 0

3 years ago

What does the president do together with the State Department?

topjm [15]

In the United States, both the President and the State Department are responsible for foreign policy, although most of these powers are delegated to the Secretary of States.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Because this quotation is taken directly from Edwards's sermon, it is considered a

NISA [10]

Primary source. is the answer i think

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What can you tell about Harriet Tuman from her actions? <br> Grade 8 Topic 5 Leeson 4 Lesson Check

lesya692 [45]

Harriet Tubman was a very strong woman who wanted to help everyone get to freedom and didn’t want to leave anyone behind. Harriet Tubman was brave and caring. She led many slaves to freedom through the Underground Railroad and is a very influential person to this day. Harriet Tubman is an amazing woman who was very selfless.

5 0

3 years ago

The U.S. Constitution makes no mention of a right to privacy. Should it be amended to affirm such a right? If so, how should the

IrinaK [193]

Answer: As others have noted, the “right to privacy” has virtually no Constitutional textual basis. The Justices in Griswold v Connecticut couldn’t even agree to which parts of the Constitution they could point to, and ended up saying it was some short of vague “penumbra of an emanation” of the Bill of Rights, but couldn’t explain what that meant or on what specific text it was based. The “right of privacy” was concocted out of thin air, in the shadows, by a SCOTUS coterie which wanted to protect people’s right to use contraceptives in their homes, but couldn't find any legitimate Constitutional basis to proclaim such a right. So they made it up. The right action by SCOTUS would have been to acknowledge that the Federal Government has no jurisdiction over contraception or abortion, those not being enumerated to the Federal Government by the Constitution and therefore denied to it by the 10th Amendment. SCOTUS should have sent the matter back to the States and directed all Federal Courts to but out. But it didn’t, leading to all the confusion and controversy that has ensued.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago