Pablo thinks that the best monist objection to make against pluralism is that it provides the simplest sufficient ontology.
Monist is the view that there is only a single material object in existence. Monism is the metaphysical and theological view that all is one, and that there are no fundamental divisions, and a unified set of laws underlie all of nature.
On the other hand, Pluralism is a political philosophy, which is seen to permit the peaceful coexistence of different interests and lifestyles.
Monism is the doctrine that the answer to one or other of these questions is only one. Opposed to monism is the doctrine of pluralism, which says that there are many kinds of things.
Hence, the answer was given and explained above.
To learn more about monism and pluralism here:
brainly.com/question/7275551
#SPJ4
Answer:
Yellow River Valley
Explanation:
Daily life in ancient China changed through the centuries but reflected these values of the presence of the gods and one's ancestors in almost every time period. In the prehistoric age (c. 5000 BCE) people lived in small villages in the Yellow River Valley.
It was Vigdís Finnbogadóttir of Iceland in the 1989 presidential election.
Explanation:
The railroad felt that the demand for passenger service was inelastic and opponents of the rate increase felt it was inelastic.
Inelastic demand is used in economics to give the idea that consumers buy or use same amount of the product irrespective of the increase or decrease in the price of the product.
So in this situation, the opponent wanted to say that same number of people will travel by rail no matter if the price of the tickets will increase or decrease. The passenger service will be inelastic.
So the answer is "the railroad felt that the demand for passenger service was inelastic and opponents of the rate increase felt it was inelastic".
