According to the War Powers Act, the President is required to inform Congress of any military operations he plans to take within 48 hours. If the United States is attacked or seriously threatened, the President may use military action abroad with the approval of Congress and under the authority of the War Powers Act. If the President fails to inform Congress within 48 hours and get permission, the decision might be challenged and overturned. In my capacity as a judge, I must inquire of the President as to why he chose not to inform Congress of his decision.
Good questions to ask are
- How strict is the standard of review on appeal, and what does it indicate for the scope of this court's review?
- Where do you excel the most? When there are two or more viable bases for a ruling, which one do you hope the court will choose, and why?
- What specific remedy are you seeking, and on what basis does the court have the power to award it?
<h3>What is oral arguments?</h3>
Generally, In a court of law, a case may be presented via oral argument.
In conclusion, For this case congress is correct.
Read more about oral arguments
brainly.com/question/15266611
#SPJ1
B the British promise them land
It's Donald Trump right now. The previous one was Barack Obama.
According to Gibbons v. Ogden, a state <u>can not interfere with the power of congress to regulate commerce.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
The case of Gibbons and the Ogden was presented in the Supreme Court in the United States of America. It was in the year 1824 and was one of the most important cases of that time.
According to this case, a principle was established and it established a legislative enactment. According to this, a state could not interfere in the power of the congress and the power that was talked about in this principle was about interfering with the regulation of the commerce. It was only in the hand of the congress and not with the states.
William did win the battle of hastings. it is said that the normans pretended to run away.
hope this helps you
