Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

13

Find 0.35 percent of 80

1 answer:

Flura [38]3 years ago

4 0

I got 28 just multiply then .35 (0.35) x 80 = 28 Hope this helped :)))

You might be interested in

How do I use substitution to solve

nekit [7.7K]

<span>The method of solving "by substitution" works by solving one of the equations (you choose which one) for one of the variables (you choose which one), and then plugging this back into the other equation, "substituting" for the chosen variable and solving for the other. Then you back-solve for the first variable.</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of these might describe expenses for a student? Select all that apply.

lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

Foods and shoes thats it

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Since 2003 median home prices in Midvale, UT have been growing exponentially at roughly 4.7 % per year. If you had purchased a h

Kipish [7]

Answer:

The home would be worth $249000 during the year of 2012.

Step-by-step explanation:

The price of the home in t years after 2004 can be modeled by the following equation:

$P(t) = P(0)(1+r)^{t}$

In which P(0) is the price of the house in 2004 and r is the growth rate.

Since 2003 median home prices in Midvale, UT have been growing exponentially at roughly 4.7 % per year.

This means that $r = 0.047$

$172000 in 2004

This means that $P(0) = 172000$

What year would the home be worth $ 249000 ?

t years after 2004.

t is found when P(t) = 249000. So

$P(t) = P(0)(1+r)^{t}$

$249000 = 172000(1.047)^{t}$

$(1.047)^{t} = \frac{249000}{172000}$

$\log{(1.047)^{t}} = \log{\frac{249000}{172000}}$

$t\log(1.047) = \log{\frac{249000}{172000}}$

$t = \frac{\log{\frac{249000}{172000}}}{\log(1.047)}$

$t = 8.05$

2004 + 8.05 = 2012

The home would be worth $249000 during the year of 2012.

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following best describes the English expression the product of

neonofarm [45]

Answer:

hope you like my answer its letter C

6 0

3 years ago

Solve the system of equations. Use any method you prefer.

ira [324]

Step-by-step explanation:

-2x-2x+5=-1-2x-2x+5=1

3 0

2 years ago