Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Question 1</u>
<u>Part (a)</u> :
⇒ 6 × 6 × 6 × 6 × 6 × 6 × 6 = 6ˣ
⇒ 6⁷ = 6ˣ
⇒ x = 7
<u>Part (b)</u> :
⇒ y² = 169
⇒ √y² = √169
⇒ y = ± 13
⇒ y = 13, y = -13
<u>Question 2</u>
<u>Part (a)</u> :
⇒ (√5)² × (√3)²
⇒ 5 × 3
⇒ 15
<u>Part (b)</u> :
⇒ (∛9)³ × (√30)²
⇒ 9 × 30
⇒ 270
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
First find the equations of the lines, then fill in the proper inequality sign. The upper line has a y-intercept of 1 and a slope of 1/2, so the equation, in slope-intercept form is

Since the shading is below the line, the inequality sign is less than or equal to. The inequality, then, is

But the solutions are in standard form, so let's do that:

AND they do not like to lead with negatives, apparently, so let's change the signs and the way the inequality is facing, as well:

Let's do the sae with the lower line. The equation, in slope-intercept form is
since the slope is 3/2 and the y-intercept is -3. Now, since the shading is above the line, the inequality is greater than or equal to:

In standard form:
and not leading with a negative gives us

Those 2 solutions are in choice B, I do believe.
Answer:
We cannot infer at the 10% significance level that the assumption of ski centers is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis for this question can be stated as
Null hypothesis H0: =4
Alternate hypothesis Ha:
The test is two tailed
Standard Deviation –
= 2
z=(4.84-4)/(2/sqrt(63))
=3.33
Z(0.1/2)=1.645 is less than Z =3.334
Hence, we will reject H0
Hence, the average growth skier ski’s four times a year is not true
165.1162791...%
To find this answer, I divided 42,600 by 25,800 and got 1.651162791... I then multiplied it by 100 to convert it into a percent and got 165.1162791...%
The "..." after the number means that the numbers continue to go on but are essentially unnecessary.
In conclusion, when you multiply 1.651162791... you get 42,600.