Answer:
yes I do think that it was very strict
Explanation:
they couldn't do anything alone they were always with somebody watching them so that they would do something like running away,whenever they would have children they couldn't stay at there homes they had to go to work the next day.the people who were in charge never gave them a decent break there was always work as well as punishments.
The people in the Byzantine Empire who disagreed with the position being argued with the quoted word would be called the <u>Iconoclasts</u>.
<h3>Who are the
Iconoclasts?</h3>
Basically, an Iconoclasm means “an image breaking” and refers to a recurring historical impulse to destroy images for religious or political reasons.
For instance, in ancient Egypt, the carved visages of some pharaohs were obliterated by their successors and during the French Revolution, the images of kings were defaced.
Hence, the people in the Byzantine Empire who disagreed with the position being argued with the quoted word "<em>Those fall into the same blasphemy who venerate the image, and the same woe rests upon both.</em>" would be called the <u>Iconoclasts</u>.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about Iconoclasts
brainly.com/question/25758528
#SPJ1
<span>For starters, technology developed and now a lot more people could hear these adresses and see them on TV and hear them through the radio and they could be recorded and studied. The Supreme court decisions were important because they decided what would happen to people and their rights. For example, the supreme court first decided that separate but equal was a good doctrine, but later they decided it was unconstitutional. The addresses could affect public opinion to support something that the congress didn't want, and the supreme court would act on behalf of the people.</span>
Answer:
Who will consume the goods and services?
How will the goods and services be produced?
What goods and services will be produced?
Explanation:
