Answer:
A. reactivity
Explanation:
how a person reacts to the things they use will demonstrate who they are
Think of a piece of paper that is enhanced to grow forever. This would
fit the definition of a plane. A plane is a flat surface that has no
thickness. A plane contains an infinite number of lines and extends
without end in the directions of its lines.
Answer:
The landscape is constantly or repeatedly adjusting to the new conditions that had developed and secondly the landscape is usually in a state of what is called dynamic equilibrium
Explanation:
Because the climate of a region slowly changes and tectonic adjustments slowly occur, the landscape is frequently and constantly or repeatedly adjusting to the new conditions that had developed and secondly the landscape is usually in a state of dynamic equilibrium only reason been that Dynamic equilibrium enables the lack of change in a system to occur because it will makes both the inputs and outputs to remain in balance or equal which will inturn makes the landscape to remains unchanged in time.
Ocean acidification is the ongoing decrease in the pH of the Earth's oceans, caused by the uptake of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Well first, cons
1.) We can't forecast the timing, so that's a biggie. The prospects of forecasting the timing for earthquakes is quite dim at the moment and not in the foreseable future.
2.)Unless you predict earthquakes 100% of the time then improper forecasting can actually result in fatalities and lifeloss.
3.)If we could predict earthquakes, there would be some huge societal implications. For instance Hurricane Katrina was predicted several days out but that didn't result in a wholly successful evacuation of New Orleans which was biased against the poor.
4.)Accurate forecasting would not change the need for preparedness and good building codes. The ground is still going to shake, buildings still need to resist lateral seismic forces, people still need to be prepared for not having gas, water, telecom, electricity, for a certain amount of time.
And pros,
It would relieve some peoples anxiety about "when the big one" is going to hit. But then that would turn into "how big is the big one" anxiety.
The questions you ask can be considered similar to "what are the pros and cons of forecasting when each of us will die". It doesn't change the fact, just what and how we worry about it.
