The settlers in Virginia were primarily Anglican. Quakers settled in Pennsylvania. Puritans in New England and Catholics in Maryland.
I think the second one might be the answer but please let me know if Im wrong
Based on the information in the excerpt, the United States brought Nazi leaders to military tribunals in Germany AFTER the end of World War II. <em>(a)</em>
BUT ... To our country's lasting shame, the horrors being inflicted on racially-selected segments of Germany's civilian population were well known to the US DURING the war, but our government did little or nothing to impede this barbaric activity and preserve civilian lives.
For example, the railroad tracks that guided the cattle-cars full of Jews to their torture, starvation, and death at Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor, and Bergen-Belsen could have been disabled with a few well-placed bombs, easily, cheaply, and with minimal military risk. But they were not.
The ovens in the concentration camps, or the camps themselves, could have been rendered operationally useless with a few well-placed bombs, easily, cheaply, and with minimal military risk. But they were not.
Yes it did it also increased businesses for other people to work in
Answer:
The question is incomplete without options. These were the views of the Federalist and Anti-Federalist.
The Founding Fathers, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay created a government based on federalism to limit the power of the National Government to limit the possibility of governmental abuses of power. Anti-federalists represented Thomas Jefferson were mainly concerned with the rights of individuals and states.
The Federalist Papers were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay intended to support the ratification of the United States Constitution.
After the Constitution was written, it needed to be ratified by 9 states, those who supported it were the Federalists while those against it were Anti-Federalists and proposed Articles of Confederation. At the conventions in 1789, arguments were canvassed by both different parties.
The Federalists felt the new Constitution was sufficient and therefore did not want a bill of rights. They defended the weakness contained in the Constitution and stated that amendments will be effected if necessary.
The anti-federalists wanted a bill of rights.
The Argument canvassed at the ratification debates by anti-federalists to justify their position was that their position represents the protection of individual liberties, limits must be placed on the power of the federal government.
